[YYYY].[MM].[DD].[hh][mm] vs. [major].[minor].[revision] [closed]
Posted
by
ef2011
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by ef2011
Published on 2011-05-19T19:17:00Z
Indexed on
2012/12/17
17:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 373
Possible Duplicate:
What “version naming convention” do you use?
I am currently debating between the traditional versioning convention [major].[minor].[revision]
and my own, almost whimsical, [YYYY].[MM].[DD].[hh][mm]
for a new project I am starting.
I understand that [major].[minor].[revision]
is probably the most popular versioning method on the planet and it is indeed pretty straightforward and reasonable, except that determining which changes merit the label "major", "minor" or even "revision" could be... subjective.
A versioning system based on a timestamp is purely non-subjective and guarantees uniqueness.
Which one would you choose for your project and why?
© Programmers or respective owner